Welcome back to real Liberty Media. Liberty Tunes. I'm Uncle Bonad. It's good to be back.
Took a last week off. I was a little busy with the day job. Life goes on. But today, oh, today we are jam-packed.
I've got something I want to talk about. The ideology over integrity going on in the open source world.
Let's see here. I've got a bunch of news songs that I want to play.
And, wow, we've got, later on, after the news in the second hour, top of the hour, we're going to do a behind-the-beats
of Chrom Khrushchevich's new album called Pinnits in the Main Frame. And I've got a bunch of covers that I did.
So, let's get this show on the road.
What do people actually think they're achieving? Anybody can look. It's called the energy dashboard.
You can get it up on your computer anytime and see on a normal day in this country where the power which is lighting your home
and your place of work and everything else you see where it's coming from.
And on a day when the wind isn't blowing, it's largely coming from gas or it's coming from imported power
which quite often comes from the Netherlands where they still burn coal.
We don't burn coal anymore because we didn't just close down our coal-fired power stations.
We blew them up. We were so certain we were right to do so.
At the same time, China is, even as we speak, building the equivalent of two, I think, two new coal-fired power stations a week.
India has a vast expansion programme of coal-fired power stations, even if George is right about his tremendous predictions of apocalypse.
Even if he's right, the contribution which this country is making by what it's doing to these outcomes is not merely minimal.
It's non-existent. Everything that we do is completely blotted out by what much larger countries are doing to maintain their own power.
Now, if you want to live in a country with net zero, if you want to live in a country where nobody can afford to heat their house
where people have incredibly expensive and largely non-functioning heat pumps inflicted on them,
if you want that kind of thing to happen, if you want lots of people to lose their jobs because there's no energy,
if you want to be cold all the time, if you want the computers which make life possible in practically every form of life
to shut down every so often, then carry on believing that the demand to go for net zero to keep it in the ground is intelligent and thoughtful.
Locked all the doors, gotta free the G-Maians or V-12s, mad black, they say save the turtles, I bought a turtle shell print hat, blew the whole crew to Dubai,
just a text in the Paris for a snack, windows clear, check the ledger, I'm paid for the war, burn that jet fuel, I can always buy a tree in some country I'll never see,
that's generation to wealth, guarantee, my new pool is Olympic heated all year round, caution daily salary, just to keep it from cooling down,
got that waggle beef flowing daily from Japan, it's sustainable because I'm sustaining my plan.
Please, please conserve water.
Make it every year.
My children are fine, they're on the other yacht.
The one that's getting offset next week, yeah.
Saviour.ai, brand spanking new, carbon offset my yacht.
I had that wrote and was originally going to stick it on the Golden PT album EP, whatever you want to call it.
Do we have albums anymore that just called EPs, extended plays?
I don't know.
Anyways, yeah, so let's get into the next one.
Today we're cutting straight to the hype circle or hype cycle.
Sorry to talk about one of the most fundamental concepts in our digital lives.
Trust.
The quiet absolute faith you are forced to place in the foundational code that runs your laptop, your server, and your phone.
We're discussing and apparently your refrigerator and your microwave and your dryer and your dishwasher, everything's getting a damn operating system.
Anyway, we're discussing the programming language Rust and the troubling velocity with which it is being integrated into the core infrastructure of Linux distributions.
Just about everything on the internet runs on Linux, just about all of the devices in your home run on Linux.
From an engineering perspective, I'll grant you, I'm not an engineer and I'm not a computer programmer, but I have done a lot of reading.
Rust is fascinating.
It's a compelling answer to decades of sea vulnerabilities.
It's got memory safety, data race prevention, all all accident features.
These solve real demonstrable problems that lead to costly security patches.
But the question we must ask ourselves is not whether the language is technically superior.
It is whether the Italy ideological commitment of the movement behind it presents an ex ex substantial risk that outweighs any technical gain.
The question is, can we trust the tool chain and the activists that are wielding it?
The empirical evidence when assessed with a healthy dose of technical skepticism suggests we may be facing a serious structural deficit in trust.
The traditional assurance of open source software has always been simple.
The source is public, therefore flaws and backdoors are easily spotted by many eyes.
This assumption is now obsolete.
The vulnerability is no longer a bug in the code.
It's an intent in the developer's mind, masked by political maneuvering.
When you have individuals who maintain critical libraries, dependencies that feed into essential system utilities,
publicly and repeatedly engaging in rhetoric that advocates for tangible real world harm against those they politically oppose, we have an ethical crisis.
The goal of any legitimate dissent, political or otherwise, must be zero casualty approach.
Doxing interfering with an opponent's security or compromising their data.
These actions can lead to real physical or financial harm.
In my opinion, the minute any activist movement, even one I might agree with, crosses that line.
They forfeit the mantle of integrity required to write fundamental system software.
They are using their technical power as a form of the ideological enforcement.
They are declaring a low intensity of digital war on users who hold different views.
And in that environment, we must apply maximum scrutiny.
We must now treat open source projects, not just as code to be audited, but as organizations who people require vetting.
The ideological problem is deeply concerning, but it's the technical architecture of Rust that transforms concern into paranoia.
We must revisit Ken Thompson's seminal 1984 paper, Reflections on Trusting Trust.
Thompson demonstrated a perfect undetectable security exploit achievable at the compiler level.
Here's the chilling simplicity.
A compiler, which compiles source code into executable binaries, is itself a piece of software.
If you modify the compiler's binary, not the source, to include a self replicating backdoor, the attack is immortalized.
The malicious compiler would be programmed to recognize two specific actions.
One, when it had compiled the target program, it would secretly inject the backdoor logic.
Two, crucially when it compiled its own source code to create a new version of the compiler,
it would inject both the original backdoor and the self-replication logic.
The net result, the malicious code, is never visible in the source repository.
Auditors can review the source code for the compiler line by line, confirming it's clean,
but the resulting binary compiled by the compromised predecessor will still carry the trojan logic.
This is not theoretical. Thompson proved it could be done.
And this is precisely the structural weakness inherent in a single bootstrapped compiler like Rust C.
If a malicious politically motivated actor manages a single non-auditable insertion into the compiler binary,
they compromise every single Rust application built thereafter, silently and indefinitely.
The entire security model is predicted predicated on the absolute uncompromised integrity of one upstream source.
This architectural choice has weaponized the human factor.
The final piece of the puzzle is the bizarre urgency with which distributions like Ubuntu and Debian are forcing this transition.
They are purposefully oxidizing their core systems,
replacing 30-year-old robust GNU utilities like coreutils and sudo with early-stage Rust rewrites like uutils and sudo-rs.
Let's apply technical rigor to the common rationales.
1. Performance
Early tests have shown mixed results sometimes lagging behind the optimized C versions.
This is certainly not a clear compelling reason for a mass migration.
2. Stability
Absolutely not.
These Rust components are often below version 1.0, have incomplete feature parity,
and have already caused public breakage and distribution upgrade paths.
You don't replace the foundation of your house with unproven materials.
3. Security
While Rust offers memory security and safety, the original GNU coreutils due to decades of continuous use and auditing
have astonishingly few active unpatched security flaws.
As one of the utility developers stated, the original team did an amazing job.
They almost don't have any security issues.
Makes you kind of wonder why they thought they should rewrite it.
So we eliminate the logical engineering-based explanations.
It's not faster, it's not more stable, and the security gain is marginal,
if not offset entirely by the introduction of new functional bugs.
What remains is the uncomfortable conclusion.
The Rust to replace the core, stable components of the operating system
with unstable incomplete alternatives is an act of ideological maneuvering.
It creates an institutional dependency on the Rust toolchain and community,
granting control and leverage to the political activists dominating that space.
It is a digital restructuring masquerading as a technical upgrade.
The simple truth is we no longer can afford to trust any single authority in our technological stack,
be it corporate or communal.
We are forced to conclude that if code can be executed, it can be compromised,
and if the execution environment itself, the compiler, is susceptible to a perfect undetectable attack,
we must treat the output with extreme prejudice.
Our call to action must be simple and non-negotiable.
We must demand a zero-trust model applied universally.
Demand independent verification.
The only technical fix for the Thompson Trojan is to demand and fund
multiple completely independent compilers for critical languages like Rust.
A non-Rust compiler, perhaps written in C, is required to compile Rust C's source code,
allowing us to compare the resulting binary hash and confirm integrity.
Anything less is faith, not engineering.
Insist on meritocracy.
We must actively support and promote software projects whose sole focus
is technical excellence and integrity, divorced from political signaling
and ideological gatekeeping.
Protect the innocent.
Our community's focus must return to the protection of the user, all users,
from digital harm, absolutely no casualties whatsoever.
Stay skeptical, scrutinize the lightensess, scrutinize the source,
and now scrutinize the people, because the tool chain knows a secret
that the source code will never tell you.
I got a song to go with that back in January of this year.
I released a bi-rebel album called Cogging the Machine,
and it had this song on it, and it's about Rust.
I've been talking about this for a while, and following it for a while.
The problem with Rust is there's only one compiler.
On C, you've got many different compilers, the C language.
In other languages, there are many different compilers to compile the software
that is written into that language.
But on Rust, there's only one.
We're the Silicon Towers, where the circuits hung with power.
I see the strings that bind our fate to a digital world.
We can escape digital chains, track our moves,
insert a back, e-stroke a hack.
A digital roar will dismantle what they swore to protect the control
to keep us down, but in this world, we wear the crown.
So here's my crime, my anthem, my call against the oppression.
Here's my cry, my anthem, my call against the oppression.
We'll stand tall in the heart of the code.
We'll find our might and fight for what's right.
U.S. blocks NVIDIA is totally not for A.I. China chips.
The White House just told NVIDIA they can't sell their B-30A8,
B-30A, there we go, chips to China.
You know, the ones NVIDIA definitely didn't design to skirt export controls.
Meanwhile, Beijing is telling everyone to buy domestic chips anyways.
The U.S.-China chip war just went nuclear.
NVIDIA is losing billions while China speedruns its own GPU industry
out of pure spite.
Open A.I. says we don't need to bail out just $1.4 trillion.
Sam Altman clarified Open A.I. doesn't want government money
after their CFO accidentally suggested a federal backstop.
They're making $20 billion annually,
but somehow they need $1.4 trillion for chips and datum centers
over 8 years.
That's more than the GDP of Spain.
We're watching a company speedrun becoming too big to fail
while insisting they're totally fine, bro.
Elon wants to build a tariff ad.
Yes, he made that word up.
Musk announced Tesla needs its own massive chip factory
to achieve self-driving.
He's even willing to work with Intel.
Which is like asking your unemployed cousin
to help build a rocket.
Tesla's going full vertical integration.
If this works, they'll control everything
from silicon to steering wheels.
If it doesn't, well...
there's X.
China just invented Transformers 2.0.
Maybe.
Moonshot A.I. dropped Kimi Linear,
claiming it's six times faster
and uses 75% less memory than Transformers.
They basically rebuilt the entire A.I. engine from scratch
because export controls said
they couldn't have the good GPUs.
If true, this changes everything.
China might have just solved the A.I. costs
more than a small country's GDP problem
out of pure necessity.
Google's comeback story.
We have the GPUs.
After getting dunked on post-chat GBT,
Google Cloud backed by weaponizing Google Cloud.
They're now selling TPUs to everyone,
including their rivals,
because money is greater than pride.
Turns out owning the infrastructure matters more
than having the smartest chatbot.
Google's playing landlord while everyone else
fights over who's winning.
DeepSeek researchers says,
we're all screwed.
A senior researcher from China's hottest A.I. startup
went on stage and said A.I.
will cause, quote,
massive job losses in five to ten years.
He views its impact negatively
at his own company's event.
When the people building A.G.I. are pessimistic
about A.G.I.,
maybe we should listen.
Or not. Stock market certainly isn't.
Robotics gets $20 billion
and delivers nothing.
VCs dump $20 billion into robotics
in 2024. Returns?
Basically zero. The only profitable robots
are still doing surgery and moving boxes,
not backflipping for YouTube.
The human-eyed robot bubble
makes crypto look conservative.
At least NFTs ship somewhere
something before imploding.
Point taken. Amazon to perplexity.
Get off my line.
Amazon sent a cease and desist to perplexity
for letting its A.I. shop on Amazon.com.
Perplexity called them bullies for
checks notes not wanting bots
on their website.
The A.I. agent revolution dies
if websites can't just say no robots allowed.
Wait, let me rephrase that.
The A.I. agent revolution dies
if websites can just say no robots allowed.
Turns out the future needs permission
from Jeff Bezos first.
Sora Android launch.
470,000 downloads of Future Slop.
Open A.I.'s video app.
Sora got 470,000 Android downloads
on day one. Four times bigger than iOS.
People really want to generate videos
of Will Smith eating spaghetti, apparently.
Consumer appetite for A.I. tools is insane.
We're speedrunning toward a world
of where nobody knows if any video
is real anymore.
Meta launches vibes in Europe. It's all fake.
Meta is rolling out its A.I. only video feed
vibes to Europe
despite Americans calling it A.I. Slop.
It's tech talk, but every video is generated
by machines. Speak 2025.
Meta's betting the future of social media
is watching computers entertain each other.
We're three steps from the dead internet theory
becoming a business model.
Amazon's A.I. translator. Now everyone can write bad books.
Kindle Translates
uses A.I. to translate
I mean, God, I can't read today.
Kindle Translate uses A.I. to translate
ebooks between English and Spanish for free.
Quality?
Global publishing just got democratized
or flooded with barely readable
A.I. translations. Probably both.
Someone's finally testing
if A.I. is actually smart. The loud
industry is funding projects to create better
A.I. benchmarks because current ones are basically
getting a passive rig test.
We're spending trillions on A.I. but measuring its IQ
with the equivalent of a bus speed quiz.
About time someone fixed that.
This startup wants A.I. to hear you over Karen's
latte order. Subtle computing
is building A.I. that can isolate
your voice in a noisy cafe.
Finally, Siri might understand you without screaming
hey Siri, 47 times.
Voice A.I. is useless if it only
works in an anechoic
chamber. This could make
talking to computers less embarrassing in public.
You know, I hear about the
A.I. slop. Yeah, it's just A.I. slop.
It's just A.I. slop.
The A.I. slop is when you just
let the computer or let the A.I.
do all the creativity.
There's no creativity in it.
But if you direct it
to do and say things
and create things,
you've got a hand in it. And you could
tell the difference between
somebody that just typed a prompt in
and lets the A.I. do its thing
and one that actually has a
conversation with the A.I.
to fine-tune it
or whatever. You can definitely
tell the difference.
Let's do some more news.
Lawmakers want proof of I.D. before you talk to A.I.
A plan to keep A.I.
chatbots away from kids might quietly make
anonymity online a thing of the past.
Are you sensing a
pattern here?
They keep forcing this online
I.D. verification.
Their whole plan is to
shut you up. And they're using the kids
for an excuse.
They don't give a shit about the kids.
You know why?
Because there's still nobody arrested
off of the Epstein list.
They tried to say there was no
Epstein list. First they said
oh there's an Epstein list. Then they said there's no Epstein list.
Then there you
then what's her name?
Gis Lane. Gis Lane.
Whatever her name is.
Yeah.
Yeah she
gave a list.
But they still haven't arrested anybody on that list.
Back to the story. It was only a matter of time before someone
in Congress decided that to cure for the Internet's ills
was to make everyone show their papers.
The guidelines for user age verification
and responsible dialogue act of 2025
or Guard Act has arrived to do
just that. Introduced by Senators Josh Holley
and Richard Blumenthal, the bill promises to protect kids
from AI chatbots that allegedly whisper bad ideas
into young years. The idea
forced every chatbot developer in the country
to check users' ages with verified identification.
The Senators call it
reasonable age verification. That means scanning
your driver's license or passport before you can talk
to a digital assistant. Keeping in mind that
AI is being ratted to pretty much everything these days
the implications of this could be far
reaching. Senator Josh Holley says
AI chatbots pose a serious threat to our kids
while Blumenthal argued that tech firms can't be
relied on to regulate themselves.
For lawmakers who spent the last
decade warning about data collection, the plan
to create a universal ID gateway for speeches
is an impressive pivot. The Guard Act answers
that call by placing chatbot
providers under a new regime of continuous
verification. Companies would have
to lock existing accounts until years
of submit proof of age. They could outsource
ID checks to third-party firms, but the liability
remains theirs. Compliance would be
enforced by the U.S. Attorney General through
subpoenas, fines, and civil actions.
For a bill that insists on minimal data collection, it
manages to authorize a lot of new data
collection. Civil liberties and tech policy
groups read the text and saw something else
entirely, a massive infrastructure linking real-world
identities to online
speech. That choice called the proposal
heavy-handed, pointing to recent identity leaks
as proof that these systems fail where it matters
most, keeping personal data secure.
K. G. Bakchi of the Chamber of
Progress added, we all want to keep kids safe,
but the answer is balance, not bans.
That balance may be hard to find once an
identity becomes a luxury.
Under the Guard Act, self-declared birthdays
no longer count. If implemented broadly,
it would set a precedent that any interactive
AI system must verify identity through
government-approved documentation. That covers
a lot of ground, AI chatbots, social media,
automated customer service, and even virtual
tutors. Ordinary users to result would
be a world where every online interaction
leaves a verified fingerprint. Once
IDs are tied to speech, privacy becomes
theoretical. Every search, comment, or
message could be matched to a name,
creating an archive of personal expression
indexed by government-approved databases.
Let me read this
to you again.
So you catch this.
Under the Guard Act,
self-declared birthdays no longer
count. If implemented broadly,
it would set a precedent that any
interactive AI system
must verify identity through
government-approved documentation.
Now take a look at what
Windows, Microsoft is doing with Windows
and what Apple is doing with Mac.
They are integrating
AI into the core
operating system.
So under the Guard Act,
you will need to provide
photo ID
and verify through
a government-approved documentation
to use your computer
at home
which means your computer will have to be
online 24-7.
Zip, zero, nada, none,
no privacy,
nothing.
Big brothers here
aren't you just
so glad?
Alright, so
I don't know if you know
if you've listened to my show for a long time,
you know King Code. He's been on the show
three or four times over the years.
His daughter is Surf Girl
on Burt Media and Hive
and she's also on
Suno. She does do some music.
She writes some songs.
And I ran across this song of hers
a couple of weeks ago I think
and it's called Loud.
Capital letters, Loud.
And it's
not, it's a
punk song
and it just kind of blew me away because
she's, what, 13, 14 years old?
Maybe 15 now? I don't remember. It's been a while.
I've known them for a while but
she's in teens and this song
is cool and I'm looking at the lyrics
and listening to it as I'm reading
the lyrics and I'm like, dude, this sounds like
a Bite Rebel song.
So I'm going to play for you her original song
and then after that I'm going to play
Bite Rebel's version of it. Dude, it's
it's badass.
Her song is just badass
but yeah, I've listened to this
like
I went to the office twice
since I downloaded this
and I've listened to it on repeat
because I got a two hour drive just to the
office, the two hour back
and I listened to it on repeat for half of that.
This song is cool.
It's called Loud. I thought that was pretty
damn cool and it's
when I threw it in
for Bite Rebel
I had it
that changed the genre of it, you know, made it a little more
heavy
gave it more
of a rap type thing, a little less punky
a little more new metal and
yeah, this was
cool. This was cool.
A Monday, Elon Musk
XAI startup launched
Grockopedia, which the billionaire is pitching
as an AI generated alternative to the
ground sourced encyclopedia Wikipedia.
Musk first announced the project in late
September on a social media platform X
saying it would be a massive improvement over Wikipedia
and a necessary step towards the XAI goal
of understanding the universe.
Musk said last week that he had delayed the launch of
Grockopedia, yeah, Grockopedia
because his team needed to do more work
to purge out the propaganda.
When Grockopedia eventually dropped on Monday, Wired
was initially unable to access the website
and received an automated message that it was blocked.
When we finally got
access to it, Wired found that the online
encyclopedia contained lengthy entries generated by
AI. Duh.
It's called Grockopedia for a reason.
Anyways, while many of the pages Wired
saw on launch day
appeared fairly similar to Wikipedia in terms of
tone and content. A number of notable
Grockopedia entries denounced the mainstream media
highlighted conservative viewpoints and sometimes
perpetuated historical inaccuracies.
The Grockopedia, you know, just like
normal Wikipedia. Anyways,
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. The Grockopedia entry
about the slavery of African Americans
in the U.S. includes a section outlining numerous
ideological justifications made for slavery
including the shift from necessary evil to positive
good. The end of the entry focuses on
criticisms of the 1619 project,
which it says incorrectly framed slavery as a
central engine of the nation's political, economic,
and cultural development.
Entries for more
recent historical events put a conservative perspective
at the center. When Wired searched
for gay marriage in Grockopedia, no entry
popped up, but one of the on-screen suggestions
was for gay pornography.
Instead, this entry in Grockopedia falsely states
that the proliferation of porn exasperated
exacerbated the HIV
AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.
Anyways,
this market
marked the onset of what would become a
devastating crisis disproportionately
affecting gay male communities, where
behaviors idealized in pornography, such as
unprotected, receptive anal intercourse, and multiple
anonymous partners aligned directly with
primary transmission routes, leading to rapid
seroconversion rates,
the Grockopedia entry claims. XAI
did not immediately return a request for comment.
The Grockopedia entry for transgender includes
two mentions of transgenderism, a term
commonly used to denigrate
trans people. The entry also
refers to trans women as biological males
who have generated significant conflicts,
primarily centered on risks to women's safety,
privacy, and sex-up-based protections
established to mitigate male
perpetrated violence.
The opening section highlights social media as a
potential contagion that is
increasing the number of trans people.
Wired magazine's entry in Grockopedia
mentions Musk's own criticism of the publication.
High-profile detractors, including Elon Musk
in February of 2025, have labeled Wired
as devolving into far-left-wing propaganda,
arguing it abandoned
technology-focused reporting for ideological
driven narratives that normalize heavy-handed
oversight of private enterprise.
The entry says, Grockopedia also claims Wired
is an emblematic of the mainstream media
systemic leftward lean.
That's...
He's not wrong, Wired.
I got a message for you, Wired.
I remember when you actually reported on technology.
Anyways, the entry for U.S.
President Donald Trump also includes a swipe at the media
for its allegedly left-leaning bias
and coverage of the outgoing federal government shutdown.
It accuses CNN and the New York Times
of amplifying shutdown narratives that attribute
blame primarily to Republicans despite bipartisan failures.
CNN and the New York Times did not immediately
respond to requests for comment.
The entries on Grockopedia
definitely don't skip in terms of word count.
The Grockopedia's entry for Elon Musk
is just short of 11,000 words,
has over 300 website references
and includes sections like criticism of regulation
and world culture, as well as advocacy
for multi-planetary life and population growth.
Musk's Wikipedia entry
in comparison clocks in at under 8,000 words.
Grockopedia has suggested search terms
related to Elon Musk include
Elon Musk dis...
dismit bigification
and Elon Musk's filmography.
In comparison when searching Grockopedia
for OpenAI CEO Sam Altman,
the top suggested on Monday was removal of Sam Altman
from OpenAI, referring to a brief incident in 2023
when Altman was temporarily removed
from OpenAI's board of directors
before returning as CEO.
Okay, this is written by Reese Rogers
over on Wired.
He's their service writer
focused on explaining crucial topics
in helping readers get the most out of their technology
prior to Wired.
Reese covered streaming as business insider.
Okay.
So let's go backwards here
through the article.
Reese, Grockopedia
is named Grockopedia.
You can assume
that 100% of the articles on it
are written by Grock
and AI.
Number one,
whining about
Elon Musk getting 11,000 words
and over 300 website references
on his article
or entry at Grockopedia compared to 8,000 words
on Wikipedia.
The dude owns Grock
so naturally
he's going to instruct them
and have people that work for him
that want to make him look good.
You make the boss look good
you get paid better.
Do you understand that?
I'm sure you understand that, right?
Let's go up here
and I was talking about Trump
including a swipe at the media
for its allegedly left-leaning bias.
If you're going to sit there
and say that the media
is not left-wing
including yourself
you have not watched
or listened to any news media
in the last 40 years.
It is nearly all left-leaning.
The only thing
that's really different is Fox
and that's kind of
towards the right
but it's still left-wing.
The only reason we're whining right now
you and all the others
is because the
ones that pretend to be on the opposite side
are in charge right now
and you guys
both sides left and right
you're both
into the stupid gaslighting pretend world
that you're different and you're not
you both have the same fucking goals in mind.
You just have a different
path on getting there
but your destination is
the exact same place.
So pretending
that you're taking a different road to get there
is better?
No, no it's not.
Let's go back up here, what was this other thing?
Oh you're talking about the complaining
oh yeah, wired is all about the technology
that's why the first thing you do is start looking
for articles on
gay marriage and transgenderism
and then complaining because it doesn't fit
your
quote-unquote reality
of how things
went down in the 80s.
Yes, I lived through the 80s
it had everything to do
with the porn
I remember it, I had friends
that were gay
I still consider him a friend
even though we haven't spoke for 30 years
but he's still around
and he's still married to his husband
and I know that he's
he's awesome, he's a nice dude
John if you're listening look me up
the other
he would tell you
Mr, what was your name?
Reese
he would tell you you are wrong
and Greucopedia
is reporting it correctly
um
complaining that there was no mention
of gay marriage in Greucopedia
again, it's owned by Elon Musk
and the articles are written by
an AI
it does what you tell it to do
complaining that their
conservative leaning or
you know on that other side of the aisle of you
when if you just go to Wikipedia
Wikipedia is not
an authority source
when people can just make shit up and put it on her
the only thing you're doing is bitching about it
not being a human that's making it up
you're bitching that it's an AI that's making it up
when are you people
going to understand
it's on the internet it's not fucking real
it never
has been real
to think that anything online is real
you need to get out of your little
fucking
pretend world
it isn't never never land
and this is wired you're supposed to be
technology driven
talking about the tech
instead of talking about how
Greucopedia was put together and built
the first thing out of the gate
ideological justifications
made for slavery
you know what's funny
anybody that actually
reads a real history
book that's printed on paper
I'm not talking about in the last 20 or 30 years
but something that was printed like you know
before 1940 or so
1950 maybe somewhere around there
back then
when you read the history books
the founding fathers of this country tried to kill
slavery from day one
and they couldn't do it because they needed
unity to break away from
England
so they needed the southern
provinces they needed
them to join up
because their strength in numbers
and to think that it was
endorsed no
yes some many of the founding fathers did have
slaves
but you know once they
what happened to those slaves
they retired very happily
and they did not leave they didn't want to leave
because they had very good lives
they were
basically
if you want to call it this they were
they were rescued
from a slave
ship
and basically paid
and give them free food
while they were here in this country
kind of like what we're doing now
with H1B1s
anyways I digress
yeah
let's change oh wow it's after the first
top of the hour that was a fast hour