Station going live in 3, 2, R-L-L-L
Station now
Who's it now?
Welcome back to...
Oh, I guess I could turn that microphone up.
Check one, check two, that's better.
That's better. Can you hear me now?
Welcome back to...
to Real Liberty Media and Liberty Tunes.
Took last weekend off.
That was a little busy.
Had a lot of stuff going on with the day job.
So had to take care of that.
But tonight...
Oh, tonight we are back.
I've got like 46 minutes of music I want to play.
I've got four brand new...
I guess I'm just going to call them bite rebel songs.
But we're also going to play a bunch of Tom McDonald
because I got my old Tom McDonald collection
pulled into the hard drive on the computer here.
So we're going to play some classic Tom McDonald.
Tom McDonald's are freaking awesome
if you don't know who that is.
Stick around because...
you're going to find out.
Let's just kick this thing off, right?
It's your choice, no doubt it!
So like I was saying, I got some news stories
not fancy news from my end of the world
but just some new stories I wanted to talk about tonight.
But also the new songs
and a bunch of Tom McDonald that I want to play.
Looks like we are streaming live
on all the usual places, party, X.
I don't know.
I did find out, I was reminded
that we do have like four Odyssey channels.
I do have some stuff that I should probably talk about.
I started another podcast here a while back.
It's called Liberty Beats
and what it is, it's my music
that I write and use AI to produce for the show
is I'm releasing it through a podcast called Liberty Beats.
It originates from Substack.
So it...
I think it's only on Substack
and Blart Media and...
Yeah, I can't remember what the other one is.
Odyssey!
But you can get those free if you want.
Each episode is literally just a song
and the show notes is the lyrics for the song.
And I just figure why not.
I've got enough stuff that I've produced
over the last nine months
that I could release a song every day
for a year and it would still come out on top.
Maybe not a year, but I don't think it's been that many songs.
But anyways, I haven't released them that quickly so far.
I think I'll put five of them over there.
And last I looked a week ago
the download just on Substack
was in the 50s for the songs.
Liberty Beats.
Yeah, 57.
Wow!
This show's podcast is up to 163 downloads.
That's impressive.
Thank you guys for listening.
And that's just on Substack.
I don't know about the others.
I don't care too much about YouTube to keep up with it.
But anyways, let's kick things off right
with the first Tom McDonald song I ever heard.
And this one just got me hooked on it
because I'm not into rap
other than stuff like rap metal stuff.
But this is not, Tom McDonald is not metal.
He's rap.
And dude, this is just straight up freaking awesome.
Just check this out.
It's the system.
We prioritize material belongings over truth.
Get a job that you can't stand so you can buy some cans of food.
Go overseas and die for freedom.
There's some oil we can use.
Our democracy exists so that you think that you can choose.
But our algorithms make you do what we want you to do.
What's the problem?
Your depressed society has you confused.
We got medication for you that you'll probably abuse.
Go get married to a lady who also don't have a clue.
And pump on a few babies that are just the same as you.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the world, baby girl.
I'll pinch you pink if that's okay.
We'll encourage self-destruction through the music that you play.
We divided out of men by trying politics and race.
And honestly, it's working awesome.
So for you, we'll do the same.
Never teaching you to love yourself.
Inject you full of hate.
Objectify your sexuality.
Then blame you for the rape.
And weaponize the differences that make our men and women great.
Then just to screw with you, erase the genders.
Everyone's the same.
We'll empower you with rights to vote and fight for equal pay.
Then have the men turn into women and you'll fight for them again.
But babies who will also do the same.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the world, everybody.
I'mma paint you black and white.
I'mma make you hate each other so that everyone will fight.
I'mma give you our religion.
Let the righteous find the light.
But I will also give you science to oppose the word of Christ.
And I'mma give you borders.
They're imaginary lines.
If you cross them, go to war and win when everybody dies.
And I'mma give you money that you'll value more than life.
And let the one percent have everything while you fight to survive.
And then I'll give you politics.
I'll call it left and right.
And while you divide yourselves, I will conquer both the sides.
Can't you see?
I'm the system.
My whole purpose is divide.
What you choose will never matter because everything is mine.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
Welcome to the system.
Everyone's a victim.
Doesn't matter if you're black or white.
It hates you all.
Here inside the system, violence is a symptom.
Fighting for what's right, but somehow everyone is wrong.
That, that, see, see what I tell you.
I told you you guys would like that.
Tom McDonald's fucking badass.
So anyways, 404 Media.
TikTok shop sells viral GPS trackers,
marketed to stalkers.
Yeah, you just can't make this shit up.
TikTok shop is selling GPS trackers,
marketed with viral videos that have voiceovers,
explicitly encouraging, secretly tracking a romantic partner.
Some of the videos have millions of views
and TikTok's shops owners.
Betrix show that, that, that.
God, I hate when they do that.
Betrix show that, that more than 100,000 of the devices
have been sold.
If your girl says she's just out with friends every night,
you'd better slap one of these on her car.
No, it's not an air tag.
It's a real GPS tracker.
One clip says, which has 5 million views.
The video shows someone pulling and putting a tracker
in various hidden locations in a car,
a plastic bag in the trunk,
magnetically attached underneath or on the inside of the hood.
And unlike air tags, this thing doesn't make a sound.
Doesn't send alerts.
She will never know it's there.
It's tiny, black magnetic,
hide it under the seat, hide it in the trunk.
Wherever.
It's got its own SIM.
So you can track her anywhere in the world.
No Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth,
just raw location data, whatever you want it.
See, this is the problem.
It's...
If you're that worried,
then you probably shouldn't be with the person.
I mean, you got to think of it this way,
just because you're married
or in a relationship with another human being.
They're still human beings.
You don't own that other person.
If they're going to cheat,
they were planning on cheating all along.
So...
I could understand having a GPS tracker on your car
for like your kid.
Especially if your kid is like...
wild, a little rebellion.
Like some certain other people I know.
I might know of someone
that was a little rebellious in his youth.
But...
If I had a GPS tracker when I was a teenager,
my ass would have been in jail a long time ago.
But anyways,
I could see that.
As long as you're not using it to track your kid down
every five minutes.
Parents nowadays tend to be a little overprotective
compared to what things were
when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s.
But yeah, that's just...
If your significant other is going to cheat,
they're going to cheat
whether you're using a GPS tracker or not.
If you can't trust them,
then you guys weren't meant to be...
should be together.
Yeah.
Don't do stuff this stupid like that.
Let's see, this one,
U.S. Treasury Ways Digital ID Verification
in DeFi Under the Genius Act.
What a stupid name for that act, that is.
Coding KYC into smart contracts
threatens to turn permissionless finance
into a gated system.
The U.S., this is from ReclaimTheNet.org.
If you've never been to it,
go check it out and subscribe.
The U.S. Treasury is exploring
whether decentralized finance,
or DeFi for uneducated people like me,
that means decentralized finance, DeFi,
smart contracts should include
embedded digital identity checks,
a move that would fundamentally alter
how an admitted...
Yeah, being anonymous in privacy function
in blockchain-based ecosystems.
This initiative stems from the recently enacted
guiding and establishing national innovation
for U.S. stablecoins,
also known as the Genius Act,
which not only establishes a regulatory path
for dollar-backed tokens,
but also mandates that stablecoin issuers
comply with anti-money-laundering laws,
including no-your-customer or KYC requirements.
As part of the law's rollout,
the Treasury has issued a formal request
for public feedback on novel techniques
to detect illicit finance involving digital assets.
In case you haven't figured this out yet...
Side note, this is not part of the story,
but in case you have not figured this out yet,
when it comes to the U.S. government
and the bills and acts and laws that it enacts
are never what they actually call the act,
but the guiding and establishing
national innovation for U.S. stablecoins.
That's not at all what it's about.
You know, the Feed the Children bill
is never about feeding the children.
Yeah, there's like maybe one percent
of the money that they launder.
I mean, that they allocate in that bill
would be for feeding the kids,
and then the other 99% is to feed
the fucking federal government.
But, yeah, when they...
And they ask for a formal request
for public feedback.
That means it doesn't matter if 10 people
or 2 million people show up
and give them public feedback
over what they want.
They're going to do whatever the fuck
they want to do anyways.
So, you know, I've learned this
through the transportation industry.
Every time the FHWA changes
rules or regulations,
they'll have a request, you know,
for drivers to give their opinions
and their feedback and what they want.
And then they just go ahead
and do whatever the hell they want anyways.
Which, by the way, speaking of trucking,
well, that's a side story.
I'll stick with this one.
One of the methods now on the table
is coding identity verification directly
into DeFi protocols.
The options listed in the Treasury's consultation
include government-issued identification,
biometric data,
and so-called portable digital identity credentials.
Spark contracts could be designed
to check for such credentials
before allowing a transaction to proceed.
Blockchain monitoring and analytics tools
are also under review.
Comments are due by October 17th.
After that deadline, the Treasury
will do whatever the fuck they want.
I mean, we'll submit a report to Congress
and may issue proposed rules.
In other words, they're going to issue the rules
because they've already got them written
and they're just doing this to make it look good
that they asked.
The backdrop to this effort
is the Genius Act itself,
which represents Washington's first full-scale
legislative response to digital assets.
The law signed by President Donald Trump
after passing with broad bipartisan support
focuses on stablecoins,
digital tokens tied to the U.S. dollar
and imposes new federal standards.
These tokens must now be backed
one-to-one by safe liquid assets
like cash or U.S. Treasuries.
So, for those of you that don't understand,
anytime you see
that broad bipartisan support,
that's code for the Uniparty
is going to do this,
whether you like it or not.
While the crypto industry spent years
and millions lobbying for regulatory clarity
on stablecoins,
the final compromise came
with substantial strings attached.
Under the law, permitted stablecoin issuers
are now considered financial institutions
for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act.
This means they must identify users,
monitor transactions,
and report activities to federal authorities,
transforming them into potential surveillance nodes
for the U.S. financial system.
Despite the Genius Act being a pro-innovation law,
privacy advocates are raising alarms
over its far-reaching implications.
Public blockchains already expose all transactions,
but the requirement to verify identities
adds a layer of personal traceability
that didn't previously exist.
Once a wallet address is linked to a user's real identity,
all historical and future transactions
tied to that wallet become observable
in full detail.
Do you get it yet?
Now, you take into consideration
here the last several years
of whether it's the truckers' convoy
in Canada, Canada,
when they did their little convoy up to Montreal
and they started debanking
all the transactions
and the supporters and the truckers themselves
that were protesting,
and they want to do that to everybody.
You hear about mostly the conservative
side of people getting debanked.
Getting debanked means
that they shut your money off
and you can't do anything with your bank
because the government can't do that.
But they can do that
by putting pressure on the banks.
And then the banks say,
well, we did it.
And then the government says,
we didn't shut your money off.
This is what they plan to do.
They plan to
make your cryptocurrency
become federal money.
Oh, the Federal Reserve
has nothing to do with it. Yes, exactly.
But it's endorsed by the government.
It is government run.
And the Fed needs to be ended
like a century ago.
But yeah, it's just
that's what we're looking at, people.
So for what it's worth
on sometime between now
and October 17th,
go make your voice heard
and tell them, fuck no,
keep your hands out of my crypto.
Next story. Well, fuck it.
Let's do a new song. Let's do
I like this one.
This one's kind of cool.
I had planned on releasing this one
last weekend,
but because of the day job I had to work.
So check this one out.
This is called fake world.
And it's about how
everything is fake.
Nothing is real anymore.
You know,
people are fake online
compared to what they are in reality.
They make shit up to
keep everybody arguing.
Just listen to the words of this real close.
I lost my spot.
Where was I at?
Right here.
Okay.
Tulsi Gabbard announces UK Retreat
from Encrypted Messaging Black Door Plan.
This is from Reclaim the Net again.
Had to take a drink. You know,
every once in a while you got to take a drink.
Damn, that's good.
This is by Ken MacMacon.
Apple's defiance held,
but the real test may come from
Brussels, not London.
British officials have
reportedly backed away from their attempt
to pressure Apple into weakening
its encryption systems,
a move that would have jeopardized
the privacy of users worldwide.
US Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed in the shift
in a statement posted on X
saying the outcome followed
months of coordination with the UK
President Donald Trump and Vice President
JD Vance.
This is the tweet
post, whatever it is you call it on X.
Over the past few months
I've been working closely with our
partners in the UK alongside
POTUS and VP to
ensure Americans' private data
remains private and our
constitutional rights and civil liberties
are protected. As a result, the UK
has agreed to drop its mandate
for Apple to provide a backdoor
that would have enabled access to
the protected encrypted data of
American citizens and encroached on
our civil liberties.
In case
you live under a rock
and you haven't been paying
attention to anything,
the UK
tried to
make it law that
yes, I'm checking
my text messages while
I'm live on the air because
that's what I do.
The UK
tried to make it law that
you can't
post offensive memes
and all that stuff.
But
they were
threatening to go after
US
citizens for that.
I don't care who you are
or where you're
at or what country
you're in.
Me, myself, I'm going to do what the fuck I want
because I have no rulers.
But
I do agree that
there should be some kind of
rules set for a society
and the people
that live in that society should
agree on those rules.
Another person that lives in
another society
hears something from
my society that I live in.
That's their problem.
They don't like
my speech.
They can fuck off.
And
yeah.
No, you're not going to come
to the US and start
extraditing people
because they posted a meme.
Anyway, back to the story of the announcement
because he coincided with Prime Minister
Keir Starmer's visit
to Washington where he joined other
European leaders for talks with Trump
that also covered the ongoing
war in Ukraine.
Although the UK government did not directly address
the specifics of any agreement
a spokesperson reaffirmed
his commitment to cooperating with the
US on security while
also protecting civil liberties.
We will always take out all
actions necessary at the domestic level
to keep UK citizens safe,
the spokesperson said.
Apple declined to comment on Gabbard's statement.
The main dispute
was a demand from British
authorities.
Sorry.
The main dispute was a demand
from British authorities that Apple
introduce a backdoor into its
encrypted systems.
Apple opposed the order
maintaining that it would
not create a method to give any party
access to users encrypted data.
Service security
experts warned that any such mechanism
would eventually be discovered
and exploited by malicious actors.
In response
to the UK's pressure, Apple disabled
its advanced data protection feature
for British users in February.
The feature which
is still available in other regions
provides end-to-end encryption
so that only the user can access
their iCloud data.
Lawmakers in the US had raised
alarms over the UK's demand
pointing to risks that such a system
could be abused by foreign governments
or criminal groups.
US authorities have also been
reviewing whether the UK
breached the terms of the Cloud Act
which prohibits either country from
issuing data demands that affect
the citizens of the other.
...
Sorry I'm yawning.
It's a long day.
Gabbard acknowledged this review
in a letter to Congress dated February 25
stating that the US
was assessing whether the
UK had violated the bilateral agreement.
While the UK
has stepped back from its demand
that Apple compromise its encryption
protections, the broader fight
over digital privacy is far from resolved.
Across the European Union
a controversial proposal
known as
quote, chat control and quote
is advancing.
One that would compel messaging platforms
to scan all user content
even on encrypted services
if passed a regulation would effectively
dismantle end-to-end encryption
by requiring providers
to monitor private messages
for potential illegal material.
...
And once again
they are using the
protect the kids
as the
excuse to
see
and know everything
that goes on
in a private conversation.
...
I got news for
any person
that is for this kind of stuff and and and a little message and a little question for everyone
of politicians that want to encrypt this stuff or decrypt private citizens personal
conversations private conversations if there's no nobody has anything private
I want you to post your bank numbers your passwords your pen numbers post them all
on x for the entire world to see post them all over social media if none of that
stuff is private or personal and everybody should be able to and anybody
should be able to access private conversations start with your politicians
may you know they're the ones that work for us we're the ones that supposed to
know everything about them that's called public office it's no it's not the
you're the ones that should be held accountable not us you should be held
accountable to to us we're not the ones that should be ruled and somewhere along
the line politicians always every government in the history of humankind
oh we're gonna be different somewhere along the line they become rulers no
matter how free they think they are holy shit I'm starting to sound like an
anarchist that's I swear the older I get the more anarchist I become more
defiance I show oh look that's a great segue to a new song defiance I can get it
to play oh I guess I gotta actually put it up here and now we can play it
UK Children's Commissioner calls for VPN digital ID checks age checks of VPNs
could mark the next step in Britain's descent into digital overreach if you've
been following the news not just the news but if you know pretty much anybody
on on YouTube YouTube's been trying to determine people's age by the videos
that they watch they have an AI doing it and it's not always accurate if you watch
a some kind of anime or something like that the AI will flag you as being under
age and then it will ask you to verify your age with photo ID so I imagine that
anybody that listens to this show I would imagine that you're over 18 or very close
to it tell you're probably a boomer borderline boomer like me but yeah anyways
let's get back to this the Children's Commission Commissioner for England is
calling for mandatory age checks on virtual private networks raising fresh
serious fresh serious concerns among digital rights advocates who warn that
such measures could severely undermine online privacy and civil liberties
speaking on BBC news bright news night sorry Rachel DeSousa described VPNs as a
gap in the current regulatory system that allows children to sidestep new
age verification rules imposed under the online safety act again we have the
for the children we got to protect kids with all due respect Mr.
Suza Mrs. Suza whatever you maybe it's not the government's place to protect our
kids it's the parents and if the parents can't do it that's where you
be focused focusing your your intentions yeah we don't need government to tell us
how to run our lives we need you to protect the borders we need you to
support infrastructure that's what government supposed to do anyways I
digress of course we need age verification on VPNs it's absolutely a
loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations she said
VPNs are widely abused are widely used privacy tools that encrypt internet
traffic and mask users IP addresses they are routinely used by journalists
human rights workers political dissidents and everyday internet users to
avoid surveillance protect sensitive data and bypass censorship DeSousa's
proposal would turn these tools into targets for enforcement effectively
requiring providers to monitor who is using them and for what purpose the
report points to VPNs as a common method for bypassing age checks which
began enforcing stricter access rules after the latest provisions of the
online safety act became into effect in July government officials acknowledged
the concern but were quick to stress that VPNs remain legal for adults a
spokesperson for the Department of Science innovation and technology said
there are no place to prohibit their use however the department warned that if
platforms are found directing children toward VPNs to avoid age checks they
could face regulatory action while Rachel's recommendations stop short of
demanding a ban requiring VPN services to implement age verification would
mark a significant change in how these tools function such a requirement would
compromise the very nature of VPNs stripping them of the anonymity they
are designed to offer and laying the groundwork for broader surveillance
infrastructure we all knew this was common it's it's it's always going
to be the next step a little bit at a time a little bit at a time it's like
the the the lobster in and the boiling pot of water
you turn the heat up just a little bit now you take a little bit of freedom
and then you take a little bit more
and say something really scary like it's to protect the children
Louisiana's war on Roblox excuse me turns parental failure into a digital ID
crusade excuse me Roblox child safety failures are now the launch pad for
statewide digital ID enforcements thank you Roblox lawmakers in Louisiana are
seizing on growing public anger over safety concerns within Roblox to
advance calls for mandatory age verification across all digital
platforms attorney general Liz Murrell filed a lawsuit Thursday targeting the
massively possible popular online gaming site accusing it of fostering
conditions that allow child predators to operate with little resistance Murrell
said that the platform's failure failure to verify users ages has
created a breeding ground for abuse and she is urging major tech companies
to adopt strict age verification protocols Roblox is overrun with harmful
content and child predators because it prioritizes prioritizes user growth
revenue and profits over child safety she stated in a press release big tech
platforms must get on board with age verification laws Murrell posted on
X you are correct about Roblox being overrun with harmful content and
child predators because it does prioritize user growth revenue
and profits over child safety but it's not that's not the answer the answer is
parents pay attention to your fucking kids in her view the platforms continued
operation poses a danger to young users due to Roblox lack of safety protocols
in the dangers to safety of the children of Louisiana she said good if
that's what you want to do geoblock it but that's not the problem once it
it's like okay let me put it let me put it to you in this perspective the
racial profiling the cops do yeah it's bad but doesn't work not every time it's
not just not the greatest thing in the world but when you're looking for the
criminal you got to look for the criminal you can't it's you know the
TSA you know at the airport and and they're checking out grandma for having
the the bottle of water or the tube of toothpaste while the the known terrorist
dude is walking through the the line with no problems and not even being
looked at yeah you got you got you know ban the guns because the guns don't
fucking kill people people kill people so you don't blame the kids and expect
the kids to prove you verify that they're a kid because you need to bear you need
to be looking for the criminal you need to be stopping the predator from getting
on on Roblox not making it harder for the kids to get on the places for the
kids it's the predators you need to stop and providing forcing them to ID
whether it's through a very VPN or whatever is not going to solve the
problem do you get what I'm saying do you do you see that how they are using
it as an excuse to take away rights and control people
without actually solving the problem
in her view the platforms continue to operation poses a danger to young users
due to Roblox's lack of safety protocols that endangers the safety of the
children of Louisiana she said the complaint filed in state court paints
a picture of a digital environment where safeguards are minimal and adult
predators can exploit animatability to target children the push for tighter
restrictions aligns the legislative efforts in the state such as rep
blue representative lori schlegel's kids online protection
and anti grooming act while the bill doesn't directly impose age
verification its provisions make it practically unavoidable
platforms would be responsible for preventing minors from interacting with
adults online a requirement that could only be met through
verifying user ages roblox which boasts over 111 million monthly
users describes itself as the ultimate virtual
universe that lets you create share experiences with friends
and be anything you can imagine while the platform does impose some limits
like restricting the sharing of personal information
and disabling video or image sharing and chats
users continue to find ways to bypass these controls
the company claims to have a zero tolerance policy for the exploitation
of minors and restricts check capabilities for users under 13
and less granted explicit parental permission
additionally private chats are unencrypted allowing roblox to
monitor conversations internally however roblox has consistently been
shown to have a child abuse problem on the platform
has been as has been documented by many reports and highlighted by several
youtubers despite these efforts murl
argues that the lack of digital id requirement leaves the door wide open
for the abuse users can sign up without any
real barrier meaning children teenagers and adults
posing as kids all mixed within the same digital spaces
the company has recently taken some steps toward addressing these concerns
in july roblox introduced a system requiring teens age 13 to 17
to submit a video selfie to access unrestricted chat features
but only if they choose to interact with trusted connections
the feature is still in testing according to the company's website
in a statement made earlier this month roblox said it had implemented
artificial intelligence tools to identify possible signs of
exploitation including sexually suggested language
according to the company these tools resulted in over
1200 reports being sent to the national center for missing and exploited
children in the first half of 2025 murl's campaign to
mandate major age verification on platforms like roblox
is meeting strong resistance online where a growing chorus of voices
argues the move would do little to protect children while inflicting
serious harm on privacy and civil liberties
social media users took the reply to murl on x to sharply
criticize her approach calling it less about child safety
and more about expanding surveillance and control
do not be fooled this is not about keeping children safe
it is about censorship and control wrote one user
who warned that companies cannot even keep your debit card and phone
numbers safe do not trust them with your identity
brilliant point a widely circulated image
in the same post links listed five reasons to say no
to digital to digital ID including concerns over privacy loss
centralized control data breaches exclusion and irreversible erosion of freedoms
others questioned why lawmakers weren't putting their responsibility on families
why can't you encourage parents to parent another user asked
age verification will do nothing if you don't bring your kids to a bar
don't leave the internet to raise them they are ample
there are ample parental tools some responses were more blunt in their
condemnation of what they saw as authoritarian overage
you want a bill you want to build a social credit
panpanitopicon when user posted the fact that you are using actual
harassment and abuse as a trojan horse to do so
is vile yes it is
the problem is with with parents and they allow their kids to do this stuff is
they're not interested in looking and seeing what their kid is doing
because they want somebody else to raise their kid because they can't get their
fucking face out of tiktok or their own fucking facebook account
me we you know i am gen X and i really do believe the gen X was the last generation
that the parents actually raised the kids
in the 90s it was just young you know tv we helped raise gen X for sure no doubt about that
but we were outside 90s kids were for the most part outside but they were coddled
and then the 2000s hit and the internet started to boom
and that's it's gone downhill ever since
you know we were told that the internet was going to make everybody smarter
all this access to information everybody was going to know everything
and yet we're the dumbest that the human civilization has ever been
you know if you want to know the real thing scientists and the theologists and other things
like that i don't know why they're calling me i am off tonight i forgot to put that on do not disturb
but um
you know we are at you know they will tell you you know the the brains the theologists
philosophers and and scientists archaeologists
they will tell you that we are the pinnacle we are at the pinnacle of human knowledge
no other civilization has been as smart as we have
and you you can blow that out of the water just by looking at architecture
go look at a modern day church
and go look at a church that was built in the 1700s
just look at the roman coliseum it's still standing
it was a marvel of engineering
had a removable floor that you could flood and
put full-size boats in
and you know yeah we could do that now but for how much money does it cost
and what's the price on that
but it doesn't look anything as beautiful as what the architecture was back then
there are roads there are roman roads that are still around the day
we can't even build a fucking highway that last two years without having to repave it
we throw up these giant warehouses for amazon and and and walmart sam's club
they're huge fucking buildings that hold millions of pounds of
product but a strong wind could blow them over because they're literally
steel rods with some aluminum sheeting for walls
you know you see these warehouses if you live around the texas area i've watched this over the last
couple of years that i was driving you go and you see these giant warehouses just boom
in the in the dallas sport worth area and these things go up you know within a matter of months
and you see they've got you know like the the concrete brick walls cement block walls
around part of the building you know mostly around where the officer is
and you know that stuff those walls get delivered to the site already built
already made some of them are not even fucking real
concrete they are literally a really hard foam that just looks like concrete
and they get delivered on a flatbed truck
and they pick them up with a crane stand them up up against the building and screw them in
yeah that's pretty efficient
but it's going to be gone in a matter of a couple of years probably if a tornado comes through
i mean are you serious this is what
uh
so let's do let's do tom mcdonald cheap
humans been controlled since the day that they were civilized the truth has been so heavily
politicized if you don't know who's controlling you and killing all the little guys find out who
you're not allowed to criticize black folks who were never ever actual slaves fighting with
white folks who ain't actual nazis controlled by rich folks who use the news to make hate
while elite folks control other political parties it's a big lie trying to make you pick sides
trying to make you burn the cities down and kill each other they got sick minds big lies
deep on the police so that there's big crime to take away our freedom to restore order they let
die play with people turn men into women make the counterculture mainstream to mix up the
system change the pronouns of gender is a spectrum so is privilege i know poor white folks and
black celebrities with millions they starve you with a lack of information and only give you facts
through a branded corporation distort your worldview with an algorithm that changes
based on propaganda curated for your engagement we can't be free fighting your brain controlling
your mouth you say lit fleet bet cap they trying to dumb you down they endorse whatever
narrative is popular to shout and use minorities and movies for diversity cloud two sides on
the spectrum but ain't none of them honest took the red pill in the blue pill spit them both
in the garbage being woke used to mean you understood your target and now it's having two
good legs and never taking a step forward if you agree it's free speech disagree it's hate speech
erase it if it came from anywhere except the mainstream trump supporters labeled as the
races but they can't be lincoln was republican and that's who ended slavery science been
politicized it's easy to see a mass became a symbol of which side you believe but you'll
never cure a sickness till you cure the greed because the problem with our natural immunity
is it's free society is broken want you locked inside a cubicle addicted to pornography liquor
and pharmaceuticals tell you that you're fat and poor and you were never beautiful than tweet how
much they love you when they hear about your funeral we can't be free have no peace they'll win
why did you buy race religion income and sex made everybody right and left the hatred got so
intense if the other side likes oxygen you'll put a bag on your head and the conspiracy theories
labeled as misinformation is just a terrifying truth that scares the hell out the nation the
system treating you like trash and you got rifles to aim with just imagine how they'll treat you when
your guns get confiscated george orwell 1984 was his last lecture george called them dot police
now we call them back checkers government surveillance trying to catch you they don't
ask questions mass incarceration equals capital for cash investors the system isn't broke it's
working fine oppressive and chaotic is how it was designed they say if we ain't doing nothing
wrong there's nothing to hide while they're agenda and intelligence completely classified
they don't teach you right to school you never learn them at all because they're easy to remove if
you don't know what they are the only people you can rule are the criminal ones so they force you
in the corners till you're breaking the law we can't be free have no peace they'll wear on the
same team but y'all are sheep
look at screams just part of the machine y'all are sheep
oh teams y'all are my sheep oh
my sheep oh
like that's all anyways fortune lawyers fire back as uk tries to censor from across the pond
american legal threats and first amendment firepower collided with britain's latest attempt
to stretch its censorship laws across the atlantic a transatlantic standoff is brewing as us
attorneys representing fourchan issued a fierce rebuttal to the uk government's recent actions
that are expensive or expensive new online censorship law the online safety act the
british recommend communications regulator off-com claims that fourchan breached duties to provide
information and comply with online censorship regulations now facing potential fines the platform
is pushing back backed by legal firepower and the threat of the us federal litigation attorneys
Preston and bern ron colman acting for fourchan responded publicly to off-com's provisional
notice which accuses the american company of failing to meet informative no information notice
requirements and possibly breaching duties related to content moderation uh this is the
i guess is the the release the statement regarding off-coms reported provisional notice
fourchan community support llc this is from the attorneys at law office the bernon storm
bernon storm pc and colman law represent fourchan community support
according to press reports the uk office of communications off-com has issued a provisional
notice under the online safety act alleging a contra contravention by fourchan in indicating
indicating an intervention intention to impose a penalty of 20 000 pounds plus daily penalties
thereafter fourchan is a united states company incorporated in delaware with no establishment
assets or operations in the united kingdom any attempt to impose or enforce a penalty against
fourchan will be resisted in us federal court american businesses do not surrender their
first amendment rights because a foreign bureaucrat sends them an email under settled
settled principles of us law american courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship
codes if necessary we will seek appropriate relief in us federal court to confirm these
principles united states federal authorities have been briefed on this matter the prime minister
sir keer strashtarmer was reportedly warned by the white house to cease targeting americans
with uk censorship codes according to reporting to the in the telegraph on july 30th despite these
warnings off-com continues it's the illegal campaign of harassment against american technology
firms a political solution to this matter is urgently required and that solution must come
from the highest levels of american government we call on the trump administration to invoke
all diplomatic and legal levels legal levers available to the united states to protect american
companies from extra extra territorial censorship mandates our client reserves all rights
off-com's provisional decision cites fourchan's alleged non-compliance with two official
requests and flags and ongoing investigation into broader content regulation duties
despite being based entirely in the united states with no operations
employees or assets in the uk fourchan now faces the prospect of a fine with daily penalties looming
of compliance if not if it's not achieved burn and colman made it clear that any attempt to
enforce uk censorship codes or levy financial penalties on an american firm will be contested
us courts in a statement burn wrote the uk government should now understand that any attempt
to touch any american company however small will be met with a coordinated us legal response
we will not let any american be picked on by any foreign power the attorneys described the uk's
actions as an illegal campaign of harassment targeting american tech firms have warned
that this extra extra territorial enforcement of censorship law was incompatible with the first
amendment american businesses do not surrender their first amendment rights because a foreign
perk bureaucrat sends them an email the statement read under several principles of us law american
courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship codes the white house has already
briefed us federal agencies and warned uk leadership including prime minister kiris dharma
to back off nevertheless op-com appears intent on pressing forward the regulator issued its
provisional decision on august 13 alleging reasonable grounds for believing fortune
failed to comply with statutory duties additional areas under investigation include the adequacy
of fortune's risk assessment for illegal content and whether it has upheld a broader safety
responsibilities the lawyers are urging the trump administration to use every app available
diplomatic and legal tool to push back against what they call extra territorial censorship
mandates a political solution to this matter is urgently required they wrote calling for
immediate intervention at the highest levels of the us government the case has ignited concern
over how far foreign regulators can go in policing content that originates outside their jurisdiction
especially when such enforcement of efforts run directly into constitutional protections
for free expression fortune was formerly reserved has formally reserved its rights
and is preparing to challenge any further actions from the uk and american courts
see this is the funny thing when a when a foreign government
sends a bill for a fine
what can they do if you don't pay it
it's not like you broke a law in their territory
you're not in their territory you're on the internet in your country
if somebody from the uk lands on your site that's their fucking problem they're on american soil
just like if i go to bbc i'm on british soil sorry but my mouth is still going to run no
matter what fucking country i'm in and most americans are the same way
britain we kicked your ass once do you really want to do it or start this again
because i don't really think you do you know we we we americans may bicker and fight
amongst ourselves but when it comes down to it i i still believe that we will stand by each
other and stand next to each other and protect each other against a foreign nation at least i hope
we would
you know i'm i'm just i'm just gonna go right out there and say it you know because i'll say it to
the u.s government just as much as i'll say it to the british government come at me bro i dare you
germany rejects us free speech criticism as social media arrests fuel international condemnation
berlin insists on free speech even as memes come with a price tag and a warrant
despite not backing down over arresting citizens for posts on social media
german officials have rejected accusations from a recent u.s human rights report that
accused the country of cracking down on free speech but discontent is growing both within
germany's borders and among its political leadership the u.s state department criticized
berlin's handling of open discourse suggesting that german authorities were restricting speech
across the country stories continue to emerge of politicians turning citizens over to law
enforcement for voicing opinions online in one case a 64-year-old man was fined 825 thousand
that's 962 u.s dollars after police raided his home over a meme that labeled then economy minister
robert haybeck a professional idiot similar episodes have raised debate about whether government
backed efforts to police hate speech are being used to suppress political opposition and dissent
let's just give one thing clear if there is no such thing as hate speech
speech you don't like is not a speech hate speech does not exist despite these developments
the german government maintains that its actions are in line with the democratic norms
there is no censorship here in germany says government spokesperson stefan meyer speaking
to cancels for chancellor frederick merc's cabinet a very high degree of freedom of expression
prevails and we will continue to defend this in every possible way meyer dismissed the
u.s criticism as unfounded insisting that the government's efforts target anti-semitism
in all its forms yet the reality looks different people are still waking up to police raids over
their social media posts while berlin's leadership claims to claims of tolerance the widening gap
between official assurances and the experience of many germans is becoming increasingly difficult
to ignore this is not specifically for my my german listener i know there's at least one of you
but uh i know hey uh jen i know i know you're listening to this if you're listening to this
on speakers and not earbuds turn it up as loud as you can and and just you put this on loop or
something okay government attention may i have your attention uk government
f*** you from an american thank you have a nice day
yo left right stop the noise shut it down your pawns in their game just clowns in their crown
they're laughing in the shadows while you scream and you shout it's time to write yo the system's rigged
they're playing you for fools dividing up the masses with their propaganda tools they want you
ready to the germanies they're banned they're batting a thousand for tonight's news germany's
federal court suggests ad blockers may infringe copyright reopens a legal case if modifying
a site's display is ruled illegal privacy features could face sweeping legal pushback
germany's highest civil court has reopened a key legal fight that could jeopardize the future of
ad blockers which should prompt fresh concern among privacy advocates the federal court of
justice bgh has returned a long-running dispute between axl springer and i o g m bh the maker of ad block
plus to a lower court to further proceedings excuse me the ruling revives the publishers copyright
claim excuse me and raises new uncertainty over whether individuals will retain the right
to customize how websites appear in their own browsers axl springer has spent years to trying to
dismantle ad blocking tools through legal action when a campaign based up on the competition law
ended in failure in 2018 the company shifted its approach to focus on copyright protections
according to heist the the strategy met resistance in the hamburg courts where judges ruled that
altering the way a page is displayed locally by the browser does not violate copyright law
the recent decision from the bgh does not decide the case in springer's favor but
criticizes the court the lower court for failing to adequately adequately consider technical details
the hamburg higher regional court must now re-examine whether browser behavior and ad
blockers interact in ways that impact elements of a website protected by copyright at the center
of springer's claim is the idea that the structure created by a browser when it renders a web page
including the document object modal the dom and css styling is part of the publisher's original
programming the company argues this qualifies as a protected work under copyright law and that
modifying it through ad blocking software infringes these rights or those rights the bgh did not
accept or reject that theory but said the hamburg court's ruling lacked clarity on essential
points it found that the previous judgment failed to specify which parts of the site were considered
protected and whether the user browser activities altered them in a way that could be unlawful
the court noted that it cannot be ruled out that the code generated by the browser is protected
and that an ad blocker interfered with the exclusive right to it the court also referred to a past
case from the european court of justice that dealt with cheat tools for video games the case concluded
that modifications do not breach copyright unless they change the underlying code
however the bgh did not treat that precedent as directly transferable to the context of ad
blockers and browser-based rendering io has largely succeeded in defending its position up to now a
major victory came in 2022 when the hamburg appeals court ruled that ad block plus simply allows
the users to make choices about how content is presented within their own browser environment
that court did not find any breach of copyright viewing the tool as an extension of user agency
the bgh you a new ruling sets that decision aside for the time being it instructs the
hamburg court to look more closely at whether specific elements of site code such as object
code or byte code are being modified if so the court must consider whether those changes qualify
as copyright violations and under what conditions if any they might be permitted a more detailed
explanation than the bgh is still expected in the meantime the case returns to the lower court for
additional fact finding observers say a final outcome could still be years away the consequences
of a decision against ad blockers would extend far beyond this individual case if courts conclude
that these tools and fringe copyright simply by allowing users to control what loads in their own
browser the ruling could open the door to broader restrictions on privacy tools germany could become
one of the first democratic nations to place legal limits on ad blockers joining a list of
currently or joining a list that currently includes only china
so essentially what they're saying is
you are you a company or somebody has the right to stick a an advertisement in your face
and you have to look at it you have to experience that ad
ad you don't have a right to not look at that ad or not experience that ad
so in other words a company or a corporation has more rights than the individual this this is just
getting flat out stupid more uk news this i'm going to have to title this this show the
across the pond shenanigans uk police slammed for silencing x firefighter robert moss over online
posts the cops took his phone his freedom and nearly his right to be annoying on facebook
there are worse ways to wake up than with the police on your doorstep but not many for
robert moss who wasn't just a shock of a dawn raid that unsettled him it was the absurdity
of what followed at 7 a.m. one morning in july staffordshire police entered his home
seized his electronic devices and arrested him not for theft or violence but for saying something
critical online about his former employer moss 56 years old spent nearly three decades in the
fire service his career ended in 2021 with a dismissal that was later ruled unfair by a tribunal
since then he has continued to speak his mind particularly in a closed facebook group
where he has voiced concerns about how the services run these posts according to police
were serious enough to justify arrest at a set of bail conditions that barred him from discussing
the fire service its leadership or even the fact that he had been arrested at all there were no
charges i was a critic of staffordshire fire service and i had been gagged from saying anything
about individuals there the service itself and my arrest that is a breach of my human rights
moss said to the telegraph after finally winning the right to speak freely again until last week
those bail conditions stayed in place under threat of future arrest it was only when magistrates
and newcastle underline reviewed the case that they concluded what should have been obvious from
the start the restrictions were excessive the court sided with moss and the free speech union
which supported his challenge its barrister tom beardsworth told the court these allow the
police to arrest and detain someone and then when they are released prevent them from telling
others what happened with the threat of further arrest if they do not comply we do not live
in a police state and mr mosh should have every right to speak about his arrest this is where you're
wrong uh who was that uh tom beardsworth yeah they are living in a police state we are living in
a police state here in the us we live in a police state in the entire world
that ought to be self-evident staffordshire police argued that the restrictions were necessary
to maintain public safety and order but what kind of disorder exactly is caused by a man
posting critical remarks in a private online group the resting officer dc isabel holliday
described the post as malicious and reckless in court however no one could convincingly
explain what real world harm had been done the magistrates seemed to agree that there was none
what remains is a narrower set of restrictions that prevents boss from contacting contacting
certain officials directly that is one thing but preventing a man from speaking about his
own arrest in the in the name of order that is something else entirely sam armstrong of the
pre-speech union called the case one of the worst examples of state overreach they have seen
in the more than 4 000 cases the speed pre-speech union is handled this is among the most amongst
the most erroneous abuses of state power we have encountered he said robert's comments were not
crimes his arrest was not lawful and the police have been acting like the stasi not a constably
military unfortunately this is not the first time british police have treated criticism as
a public safety risk and the way things are going it won't be the last increasingly the
concept of order is being used not to protect citizens but to protect institutions for public
scrutiny that is a dangerous shift mosses posts were blunt they may have been irritating to those
in charge but they were not criminal in a democracy where people are allowed to criticize their
leaders they are allowed to be wrong rude rude and persistent they are allowed to be a nuisance
what they should not be as arrested and silent support this time the court's got it right
but the fact that it needs to go this far is troubling yes yes it is
ah let's see here let's do oh wow it's 934 let's do a couple more here supreme court allows
the mississippi age fabrication law to take effect advancing online digital id push
the fight over hjx is rapidly becoming a battle over the future of animatity online
the supreme court's choice to let mississippi enforce this new age verification law
is part of a growing shift toward digital id requirements across the internet
raising urgent concerns about privacy and censorship by declining to block the law
whilst legal challenges continue the court has effectively allowed states to begin tying
online activity to users real-world identities a move that could reshape how people access
information and speak freely online mississippi's hb 1126 requires social
media platforms to verify a user's age before allowing them to create an account
those under 18 must obtain parental permission platforms are also required to restrict access
to what the state broadly labels as harmful content for companies to comply identity checks
will be necessary meaning users may soon need to provide government ideas
IDs or personal documents just to post or view content on public platforms
the supreme court has already allowed a similar texas law to be enforced
jessus brett cavanaugh writings separately from the court's unsigned order stated that the
law is likely unconstitutional and said net choice had likely shown that the
enforcement would violate the first amendment still the court allowed the law to take effect
saying the trade group had not shown a strong enough risk of harm
to justify emergency relief net choice which includes companies such as
meta google amazon reddit and discord argues that the mandatory age checks for general
purpose platforms violate pre-special protections the group had previously won a ruling to block
the law but that decision was over has was overturned in april by the fifth circuit
court of appeals paul task a co-director of the net choice litigation center said the
ruling was a delay not a defeat although we're disappointed with the court's decision
just as cavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that net choice will ultimately
succeed in defending the first amendment not just in this case but across all net
choices id for speech law students he said the larger implications of the law go far
beyond use safely use safety i'm sorry it advances the infrastructure for an internet
where identity is verified at the door this kind of a system connects everything a person
says reads or searches online to a name a date of birth it possibly a government id it increases
the risk of censorship as users may less likely likely as users may be less likely to express
controversial or unpopular views if those comments are permanently tied to their
legal identity it also amplifies the risk of data exposure since any breach could link personal
data specific online activity similar systems are already gaining control in other countries
the united kingdom has begun began enforcing rules that ask users to confirm their age
through id cards biometric scans or credit card details all those these efforts are framed
as protections for children they are also they also create large databases
of verified identified identity information that can be misused leaked or repurposed for
surveillance by letting the mississippi law proceed the court has at least for now
cleared the path for more states to implement similar systems
it is getting extremely extremely scary
another one make sure this isn't the same story but a different okay age verification lobby pushes
for age verification checks for vpn use oh yeah we already we already did this one
shut that tab off
irish government pushes this info plan despite public backlash public backlash was treated like
background noise as the state wrote its own rules for truth despite an avalanche of opposition
from the public the irish government has pushed ahead with its controversial national
counter disinformation strategy without conducting any evaluation of how such policies
might restrict freedom of expression the plan quietly released in april follows a government
run consultation in late 2023 that revealed widespread rejection of the proposed measures
don't get in your eye an independent review by dripped of all 470 responses submitted
during that consultation found that 83 percent of participants were against the plan entirely
a similar majority raised concerns about threats to civil liberties and four out of five said the
entire scheme should be dropped none of that stopped the government from proceeding surprise
surprise instead of reckoning with criticism officials simply published a strategy and
presented it as a positive step in the fight against disinformation a term that remains
undefined and highly malleable when asked by gripped whether any internal analysis had been
conducted to measure the potential impact on speech rights the department of communications
confirmed there had been none the strategy outlines plans to increase state-supported fact checking
introduce pre-bunking campaigns to shape narratives before information spreads
and use online advertising tools to suppress content flagged as misleading in other words
they're going to censor people censor people that's the online advertising tools to suppress
content flagged as misleading that's the censorship part and introduce pre-bunking
campaigns to shape narratives that's called propaganda propaganda government-sponsored
propaganda at the same at the time of the consultation's launch in september 2023
then media minister kathryn martin said public input was important it is important to and
seek the views of the public i would encourage people to submit their views he stated
they're not going to listen to you but you can say it people responded in large numbers and
there were they were overwhelmingly opposed grips full breakdown found that only 11 percent of
responses supported the government's direction four percent were neutral or mixed and another two
percent were unclear or duplicate entries most of the support came from state linked entities
including government departments local authorities public funded NGOs like the hope and courage collective
and several universities meanwhile ordinary members of the public made up the vast majority of
submissions many expressed frustration distrust and a belief that the government was attempting
to control speech under the guise of protecting the public some quotes of the comments are
very dystopian the government should stay out of people's lives and stop pushing legislation no one
wants to wrote it on regulation of the media is already practicing communities communist countries
this principle is disgraceful it's an excuse for government censorship it should be scrapped
this information is one of those contrived words which is at best ambiguous and can be molded
to favor any argument some of those who supported efforts to combat false information
still called precaution warning that government-led messaging campaigns can easily cross the line in
the censorship i'm going to i'm going to fix that last statement for you this is how it should
read some of those who supported efforts to combat false information still called for caution warning
that government-controlled propaganda campaigns can easily cross the line into censorship
it is crossing the line into censorship come on people quit playing with words just say the
truth this is reclaim the net who wrote this story city harper quit trying to beat around the
bush just come right out in the set it's it's in order to combat information that they that the
government does not agree with they're going to do government propaganda campaigns to censorship
to censor people god it's not that hard do i need i think i think i need to remind people of this
this this is a song it's called ghost of the fall and it's brand new well it's not brand new
lyrics have been around for probably six months or so but this is a reminder to people of what
dictatorships and authoritarianism does governments do these things
from gulags cold to the camps of despair the ghosts of the past scream beware beware
the screams i feel time is now let the ghosts be heard the sacrifices are rebels word from the
ruins of their shattered dreams will build a world where the freak can scream no more tyrants no
blood to spill well out of that you see why and you and you
you look back through history at all of the authoritarianism it did and no matter what
how good the intentions were of the people that started the country or the government
but it always gets corrupted
i'm i don't in order for the for society to work the people have to respect each other
and you
if there's no respect for a fellow human being
there's it society's gonna fall apart and that's what's we've been experiencing
and it's gotten worse just in my lifetime
and it's going to continue to get worse until people start respecting people
when you don't give a shit about another human life when you care more about a dog
than a human life
i get you know that you're pissed at the world or that you're pissed at that a human
but the human life should always take precedent over everything else
it doesn't matter whether or not you agree with their ruler
or you whether you agree with what they've done in the past
except for child you know child break beyond thin you should just go right into a woodchipper but
the the thing is when it's others you know if as long as you're you know somebody being a thief
or even if they you know murdered somebody
it's not up to you
whether they live or die you should keep them alive so that they
have to think about what they did
that's how they pay the price you don't pay the price by
by being killed yourself and essentially that's that's exactly as bad as
them killing the other person
what i'm saying is that you should respect the human life enough
to allow them the decision on whether or not they
should keep on going keep on living
that's their decision not not others to make just like it should be your decision on whether or not
you
allow the government excuse me to
control your kids raise your kids you should be willing to raise your kids
don't let the government do it because the government will only teach them
that government will protect them and they won't government turns them into slaves
good little slaves so on that note we're going to end the show with the classic from
Tom McDonald and it's clown world
if you're if you're a Tom McDonald fan you know this song clown world we'll catch you guys again
next time tomorrow i'm going to do something that's totally different tomorrow i'm going to try to
stream live at the same on you know stream video live at the same time that i'm streaming
and you know the radio so we'll see how that works out it might work it might not
but uh tomorrow i got some stuff i want to show off with open man driva and yeah it's
going to be fun might even work on a song live on air tomorrow but we will find out
how it all works tomorrow keep your fingers crossed it's going to be a fun experiment
we'll talk to you guys again next time be good be safe never ever stick your finger where you wouldn't
stick your face you worry about leaving a better planet for our kids how about leaving better kids
for our planet entire generation offended at everything getting mad that a human thinks
all lives matter we don't need black or white or left or right but we need this common sense
we need balance for all in the same boat why are you trying to make holes if they think we
sank this is madness i'm offended that you're offended by me taking offense can't build a
wall why does your house have offense i believe in two genders i'm not that of the rest i'm just
confused when a dude has appeared in some breasts we won't always agree nope i don't hate all police
nope i don't think that the system's racist i just think the system hates people i think fighting
violence with more violence is what they want viruses and riots people dying we won't stay home
black lives matter all lives matter what's all this division for its modern segregation this
is setting up a civil war burn the circus down faces that we hated were the ones that we ran and
didn't win and we stopped playing with each other started hating on each other started noticing
the color of our skin christians and atheists immigrants patriots we love the country but we
are not saving it wages don't raise through the rate of inflation and half of the country hates all
of the nation it's funny that we think the world owes us some all the phones got smart but the
people so dumb we care more about the likes on a selfie than our moms on the only time we
ever speak the truth divides it's probably what has got us here united states is great regardless
that's what we forgot in here black lives matter all lives matter what's all this division for its
modern segregation this is setting up a civil war burn the circus down and then they judge you
on the internet till everybody hates you for it if jesus was alive i swear to god they
all would cancel because lately being negatives the real new normal yeah if you think you're
fat you're rich you're bad you're poor you're black you're white you're white they lie it's
my generation needs a bunch of free condoms common sense ain't that common this is what they wanted
this is how they plan it this is the control everyone on the planet that we put each other in
cask is protesting panic and they take advantage to manage the babies but they're creating chaos so
they have something to save you from black lives matter all lives matter what's all this division
for its modern segregation this is setting up